SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 802

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Dinesh Prasad Son of late Bhondil Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Prashant Sinha. Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Kumar Pankaj, AC to SC-5

JUDGMENT :

1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 09.12.2014, issued by the Inspector General of Police, Bihar Military Police, Bihar, Patna (Respondent No. 4) whereby and whereunder the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed as also for quashing the order dated 07.04.2014, issued by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Military Police (Northern Division), Muzaffarpur (Respondent No. 5) whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been dismissed from service. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing the inquiry report dated 17.11.2012, pertaining to the departmental proceeding no. 3/2012, as also the supplementary inquiry report submitted by the Conducting Officer-cum-Dy. Superintendent of Police, BMP-8.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as a Clerk in the office of the Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga on 13.02.1988. In between 16.2.2006 to 12.2.2007, the petitioner remained posted as Clerk in the office of the Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur and also worked as Accountant till 22.9.2006, whereafter, on 13.2.2008, he was transferred to BMP-8, Begusarai. On 01.10.2010, an FIR bearing Muzaffarpur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top