SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 230

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Ramesh Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. Manoj Kumar Panday.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, APP.

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J. – Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Panday, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. By the impugned judgment of conviction dated 3006.2015 and order of sentence dated 3.7.2015 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur at Ara in Sessions Trial No. 44 of 2013 arising out of Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 196 of 2012 (G.R. No. 3373 of 2021), the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under: –

Conviction under Section

Imprisonment

Sentence Fine (Rs.)

In default of fine

302 of the IPC

Imprisonment for life

50,000/-

S.I. for six months

3. A fardbeyan of the wife of the deceased, Sushila Devi (PW-2) recorded at Primary Health Center of Jagdishpur at 9:00 pm on 27.10.2012 by a Police Officer of Jagdishpur Police Station is the basis for registration of FIR. The present appellant is the own brother of the deceased. It emerges from the said fardbeyan that there was some dispute in relation to sharing the amount of old-age pension received by the mother of the d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top