IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
SANJAY KAROL, S. KUMAR, JJ.
Bibeka Nand Sharma S/o Late Ram Balak Singh – Petitioner
Versus
The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18929 of 2021
Decided On : 15-02-2022
BIADA Act - Industrial Land Allotment - Section 6(2)(a) of BIADA Act 1974, as amended in 1991 - Summary: The court addressed the cancellation of industrial land allotment under section 6(2)(a) of the BIADA Act 1974, as amended in 1991. The petitioner's appeal against the cancellation was rejected, but the court directed the petitioner to approach the authority with a concrete offer and undertaking, which was accepted as compliance. The court quashed the office order and the appeal order, emphasizing the consequences of breaching the undertaking.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's industrial land allotment was cancelled by the Executive Director of BIADA, and the appeal against the cancellation was rejected by the Addl. Chief Secretary, Department of Industries, Bihar, Patna. The court directed the petitioner to approach the authority with a concrete offer and undertaking, which was accepted as compliance.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's undertaking and compliance with the stipulations were acceptable, and the consequences of breaching the undertaking were explained to the petitioner.
Issues: Cancellation of industrial land allotment, rejection of appeal, compliance with undertaking, consequences of breaching the undertaking.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of the petitioner's compliance with the undertaking and the consequences of breaching it, leading to the quashing of the office order and the appeal order.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the petition, accepting the petitioner's undertaking and compliance, while reserving the liberty for BIADA to approach the court in case of breach, and quashed the office order and the appeal order.
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KAROL, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:
This writ application is also directed against an order dated 30-07-2021 passed by the Addl. Chief Secretary Department of Industries, Bihar, Patna in Appeal No. 27 of 2020 preferred by the petitioner for setting aside the above referred order dated 16-11-2019 issued vide memo no. 673l/D/CN-51004 dated 20-11-2019, but the petitioner's appeal was rejected by the impugned order dated 30-07-2021 in appeal no. 27 of 2020 and the order passed by the Executive Director has been upheld.
This writ application is also for issuance of appropriate writ or writs order or orders directing the respondents to restore the title of the leased out land in question measuring about 5,000 sq. ft. located within Industrial Area Campus, Bihar Sharif, at Nalanda, appertaining to plot no. H1(p), which was purchased by the petitioner in an auction sale conducted by BSFC on 05-08-1999.”
3. On 31st of January, 2022, we had passed the following order:
Learned counsel for the BIADA states that as on date, a sum of Rs. 12 lacs (approx.) is due and payable by the petitioner. The petitioner has been dilly-dallying the issue of establishment of the industrial growth in terms of the plot allotted to him. However, if petitioner were to furnish an undertaking to the statement made, recorded supra, BIADA may consider and take a favourable decision thereupon.
We direct the petitioner to immediately approach the respondent No. 4 namely, the Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna-800004 on 07.02.2022 at 10:30 A.M. with a concrete offer furnishing an undertaking in terms of the statement made before this Court and a decision shall be taken by the authority before 14.02.2022.
Affidavit of compliance be filed on the terms of statements.
Should the party agree to have the matter settled amicably, petitioner shall file his undertaking to this Court.
List on 14.02.2022.”
4. Today, supplementary affidavit dated 11th of February, 2022 stands filed by the petitioner, inter-alia, making the following averments:
3. That allotment of the industrial plot measuring about 5,000 sq. ft. in Bihar Sharif Industrial Area to the petitioner was cancelled on 20.11.2019 by the Managing Director, BIADA and such can
Compliance with undertaking and consequences of breaching it are crucial in the disposal of the petition.
Acceptance of petitioner's undertaking and consequences of breach as a basis for quashing orders.
Failure to utilize allocated industrial land justifies its cancellation under statutory provisions.
The court established that under the Bihar Industries Commercial Policy, 2016, authorities must consider unavoidable circumstances affecting compliance with allotment conditions and allow for opportu....
The court upheld the cancellation of land allotment due to the petitioner's non-utilization for over twenty years, reinforcing authority's jurisdiction under the BIADA Act, 1974 and its amendments.
Compliance with the provisions of Sub-section 2 of Section 6 of the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority Act, 1974 is essential in the cancellation of plot allotments by the authority.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.