SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 284

SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Shakuntala Devi – Appellant
Versus
Maya Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Prakash Mahto.

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This Civil Miscellaneous Application has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 17.07.2018 passed by learned Sub-Judge-IV, Jamui in Title Suit No. 219 of 2014 whereby the learned Court below allowed the impleadment Application for the impleadment of Respondent Nos. 10 and 11 as defendants in the instant suit.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent nos. 10 and 11 have filed a petition dated 24.11.2017 under Order 1 Rule 10(2) and under Section 151 CPC for their impleadment as necessary party in Title Suit No. 219 of 2014 on the ground that part of land in dispute refers boundary of the lands of intervenor which they, being ex-military personnel got through settlement from the Government and as such they are necessary parties in the suit. The petitioners, who are plaintiffs/petitioners objected the said claim stating that they are not the necessary parties in the suit but the said application was allowed by the learned Court below without hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners. He has further submitted that the learned Court below without assigning any reason a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top