SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Mohammad Rafi Rain – Appellant
Versus
Md. Hanif – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Niraj Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. A.K. Sahani and Mr. Anand Kr. Pandey, Advocates

JUDGMENT

The instant civil miscellaneous petition has been filed under article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 03.02.2022, passed by learned Civil Judge/ (Jr. Division) I, Palamau at Daltonganj in Title Suit No. 64 of 2010 whereby and whereunder the Court below has rejected the application of the petitioner under Order I Rule 10 (2) CPC for impleading as a party defendant in the said suit.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/ intervener submitted that while passing the impugned order the learned Civil Judge Junior Division has failed to properly appreciate the facts and the law involved in this case and arrived at erroneous conclusion. The court below should have held that the intervener applicant has right, title, interest and possession over the suit land inherited from his father Mohammad Sheikh Abdul Rahman along with other family members including the defendant joined in this case namely, Wasi Ahmad respondent no.2, own younger brother of the intervener/applicant. It is admitted by plaintiff that originally the suit land belong to late Abdul Rahman but it has been falsely pleaded that said Sheikh Abdul Rahman executed a “Bazidawa” in the year 19

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top