IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
SUDHIR SINGH and CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH, JJ.
Criminal Appeal (DB) Nos. 270, 301, 307, 337 of 1995
(5.7.2023)
Sri Kishun Thakur (in 270)
Hariman Ahir @ Hariman Yadav (in 301)
Lallan Mahato (in 307)
Bishundhari Dusadh
& Anr. (in 337) … Appellants
vs.
State of Bihar ... Respondents
(in all)
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302/149 and 147 – Murder and rioting – Common object – Life sentence – There are material inconsistencies and uncertainties regarding place of occurrence – There is complete failure on part of prosecution to adduce any evidence so as to prove place at which deceased persons were done to death – No eye witness has been brought on record by prosecution to testify regarding the manner in which three deceased persons were done to death – In criminal law, loose, contradictory, and uncorroborated statements cannot be relied upon, much less than forming basis of conviction – Statement of witnesses must be free from blemish and devoid of any ambiguity, uncertainty, and loopholes – Investigating Officer has also not found any torch during course of investigation – There is substantial delay of 10 to 11 hours in lodging F.I.R. – F.I.R. should be lodged without undue and unreasonable delay – Informant has turned hostile – No material has been adduced by prosecution so as to establish causative link between actus reus and conduct of appellants herein – Prosecution has failed to adduce sufficient evidence to prove connecting chain of circumstances as to form inference about guilt of appellants – There are several laches on part of prosecution and there is absence of concrete material to make out a foolproof case against appellants – Judgment of conviction and order of sentence set aside. (Paras 10 to 15)
Criminal Law – Administration of Justice – Truth is guiding star in entire judicial process – Truth alone has to be the foundation of justice – Court at all levels must seriously engage itself in journey of discovering truth – It is duty of prosecution to prove case beyond reasonable doubts by establishing that chain of evidence unerringly point towards guilt of appellants and no other hypothesis is possible. (Para 14)
Sudhir Singh, J.—Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the State.
2. These criminal appeals arise out of same judgment of conviction and order of sentence, hence they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
3. The criminal appeals have been preferred against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 28.08.1995 passed by Shri Damodar Prasad, learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Arrah in Sessions Trial No.297 of 1980 arising out of Koilwar (Chandi) P.S. case No.3(1) of 1979, whereby and whereunder the appellants Sri Kishun Thakur and Ram Lal Mahto of Criminal Appeal (DB) No.270 of 1995 have been convicted under Sections 147 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code (referred to ‘I.P.C.’) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year under Section 147 of I.P.C. and rigorous imprisonment for life under Sections 302/149 of I.P.C. The Trial Court also convicted the appellant Hariman Ahir @ Hariman Yadav of Criminal Appeal (DB) No.301 of 1995, appellant Lallan Mahato of Criminal Appeal (DB) No.307 of 1995 and appellants Bishundhari Dusadh and Yogendra Dusadh of Criminal Appeal (DB) No.337 of 1995 under Sections 148 and 302/149 of I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years under Section 148 of I.P.C. and undergo rigorous imprisonment for life under Sections 302/149 of I.P.C. All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.
4. The prosecution case, as per the fard beyan of informant Chandeshwar Singh recorded on 04.01.1979 at 5:00 a.m. before the Officer Incharge of Koilwar Police Station in front of the house of Ram Kareshan Singh (deceased) is that, in the preceding evening i.e. on 03.01.1979 at about 6:30 p.m., while he was sitting at the darwaja of Sripati Singh, his co-villager Kathari Ahir armed with pistol, Sukhal Ahir armed with garasa, Hariman Ahir armed with bhala, Ramakant Dusadh armed with katta, Ramautar Dusadh armed with pistol, Bishundhari Dusadh armed with katta, Yogendra Dusadh armed with bhala, Chandrika Dusadh armed with pistol, Ram Lal Mahto armed with lathi, Srikishun Thakur armed with lathi, Jarishri Kahar armed with garasa, Lallan Mahto armed with farsa and other accused persons armed with deadly weapons were raising slogans “Enclab Naxalbari Jindabad” and were moving towards north. The informant identified all the accused persons in the light of torch flashed by the accused. The informant alongwith Sripati Singh, Gupteshwar Singh, Bharat Singh and others also followed them. The accused persons reached the house of Ramdeo Singh. It has been further stated that Kathari Ahir and Sukhal Ahir climbed on the roof of the house of Ramdeo Singh and they were dismantling tiles. They also set fire in the southern side of the house of Ramdeo Singh. All the accused persons surrounded the house of Ram Kareshan Singh from all sides and they were raising hulla and abusing Ramdeo Singh. They were saying Ramdeo Singh to come out from the house, otherwise his whole family would be eliminated. The informant and others forbade the accused persons, who were Nexalites, from doing such act. Thereupon, the accused persons also chased them with a view to kill and opened four rounds of fire. The informant and others left the place out of fear and reached near his house and raised hulla to assemble, as the Naxalites had surrounded the house of Ram Kareshan Singh and they have set fire in the house and were also killing the inmates of the house. The informant alongwith others again went near the house of Ram Kareshan Singh, but because of indiscriminate firing made by Naxalites, none of them reached the house of Ram Karesan Singh. Thereafter, the informant saw the accused persons and 50-60 other criminals running away from the house of Ram Kareshan Singh towards north. The informant and others went inside the house of Ram Kareshan Singh, but they did not find anyone inside the house. They also found blood stains on t
Murder – Conviction on the basis of conjectures and surmises is fatal for justice and fairness.
The prosecution must establish the place of occurrence, presence of witnesses, and identification of the accused beyond all reasonable doubts. Prompt lodging of the FIR and examination of the Investi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.