P. B. BAJANTHRI, ARUN KUMAR JHA
Prince – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
P. B. Bajanthri, J.—
Re: I.A. No. 01 of 2022 (LPA No. 650 of 2022)
Heard I.A. No. 01 of 2022.
2. I.A. No. 01 of 2022 has been filed in LPA No. 650 of 2022 arising out of CWJC No. 6259 of 2019 for condonation of delay.
3. For the reasons stated in the application and affidavit, delay of 17 days in filing LPA is condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01 of 2022 in LPA No. 650 of 2022 arising out of CWJC No. 6259 of 2019 stands allowed.
Re: I.A. No. 01 of 2022 (LPA No. 661 of 2022)
4. Heard I.A. No. 01 of 2022.
5. I.A. No. 01 of 2022 has been filed in LPA No. 661 of 2022 arising out of CWJC No. 21219 of 2018 for condonation of delay.
6. For the reasons stated in the application and affidavit, delay of 15 days in filing LPA is condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01 of 2022 in LPA No. 661 of 2022 arising out of CWJC No. 21219 of 2018 stands allowed.
Re: I.A. No. 01 of 2023 (LPA No. 657 of 2022)
7. Heard I.A. No. 01 of 2023.
8. I.A. No. 01 of 2023 has been filed in LPA No. 657 of 2022 arising out of CWJC No. 21219 of 2018 for condonation of delay.
9. For the reasons stated in the application and affidavit, delay of 18 days in filing LPA is condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01 of 2023 in LPA No. 657 of 2022 arisi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.