PARTHA SARTHY
Zaffir Ahmad Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Partha Sarthy, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioners,
2. Learned Standing Counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Bihar Public Service Commission.
3. The petitioners have filed the instant application for the following reliefs:
i. For directions to the respondents concerned to recommend the name of the petitioners and to issue appointment letter to the post of Accounts Officer.
ii. For direction to the respondent to appoint the petitioner in light of Rule 15 of Bihar Accounts Services Rules 2000 (as Amended from time to time).
iii.For directions to respondents to recommend the name of the petitioners for appointment on the post remained vacant due to non-joining of the some of the earlier recommended candidates.
iv.For holding and a declaration of Rule 15 of Bihar Accounts Services Rules 2000 (as amended) and recommendation of the petitioners name for appointment, as he is eligible to be appointed on the post, after vacancy due to non-joining of recommended candidates.
v. For holding and a declaration with regard to the petitioners' candidature as eligible who is placed at Sl. No.- 129 and 135 respectively in combined merit list and now is fit to be appointed i
A.P Public Service Commission, Hyderabad and another vs. B.Shant Chand and others
Dr Poonam Kumari vs. State of Bihar and others
Kulvinder Paul Singh vs. State of Punjab and another
Raj Rishi Mehra and others vs. State of Punjab and another
State of Bihar and others vs. Amrendra Kumar Mishra
Surinder Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and Anr.
Vijay Kumar Sharma and others vs. Chairman, Food Service Commission and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the action of the respondents in not preparing a waiting list in compliance with Rule 15(3) of Rules 1992 was arbitrary and against the spirit....
Public Service Commission - Promotional benefit - Candidates who have not taken birth in the cadre, the services would be counted prior to the date of appointment which cannot be allowed.
The petitioner's claim for appointment on the post of JLO from the reserved waiting list was found to be valid as he approached the Court before the expiry of the wait list, and the Court allowed the....
The court established that while inclusion in a merit list does not guarantee appointment, any deviation from established recruitment processes must be justified and cannot be arbitrary, ensuring com....
Appointment of Civil Judge (Junior Division) – Cancellation of candidature of candidates on technical grounds would be improper, unjustified and not warranted.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.