SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 323

PURNENDU SINGH
Most. Mohini Devi – Appellant
Versus
Vice Chancellor, L. N. Mithila University, Darbhanga – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ratan Kumar Kumar.
For the University : Mrs. Binita Singh.

Purnendu Singh, J.—Heard Mr. Ratan Kumar Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. Binita Singh, learned counsel for the University.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner who is the first wife of the deceased employee namely Baidyanath Jha has been denied retiral dues and family pension. He submits that the Aadhar Card No. 710536844811 would indicate that the petitioner Mohini Devi is the legally wedded wife of the deceasedemployee Late Baidyanath Jha and she is entitled for all pensionary benefits which has been denied in spite of specific order of this court dated 14.03.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 142 of 2019. He refers to the operating part of the order dated 14.03.2019 which is reproduced hereinafter:—

“Considering the nature of claim made by the petitioner, let the petitioner file a detailed representation before the respondent no.2, The Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga which will be disposed of within a period of three months from the filing of such representation. If the petitioner is entitled to any amount, the same shall be paid within a period of two months thereafter.

If death-cum-retiral be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top