Back
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Julee Kumari @ Julee Devi, Wife of Dilip Prasad Sah – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to GP-27 for the State.
2. The petitioner in the present case is seeking a direction to the District Magistrate, Banka (respondent no. 4) to dispose of the matter which was remanded by the Divisional Commissioner, Bhagalpur (respondent no. 3) vide his order dated 01.06.2011 passed in Misc (Anganwadi) Appeal No. 34 of 2010-11.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petitioner was appointed as Anganwadi Sevika. She was removed vide order dated 26.06.2007 passed by the District Magistrate, Banka in complete violation of principles of natural justice. She applied for review of the order but that was rejected. The petitioner moved this Court in earlier round in CWJC No. 5203 of 2010. It was submitted that the Commissioner was the competent authority to hear the appeal against the order of the District Magistrate under the regulation as framed in 2006 read with the Amendment dated 25.07.2008. Taking note of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and the State, this Court vide order dated 21.09.2010 disposed of the writ application with a direction to the Divisional Commissioner, Bhagalpur to hear
The main legal point established in the judgment is the recognition of the statutory duties of Anganwadi workers and helpers under the National Food Security Act, 2013 and the rules/guidelines framed....
The main legal point established is the applicability of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 to Anganwadi Workers and Helpers.
Termination of Anganwadi Workers must be done by the Appointing Authority, and the principles of natural justice must be followed.
Selection guidelines take precedence over advertisements in recruitment processes, especially in cases involving designated community preferences.
The court upheld the termination of an Anganwadi Worker based on valid grounds, emphasizing the importance of adherence to government guidelines and the unsuitability of disputed facts for writ juris....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
