Back
SANJAY KAROL, PARTHA SARTHY
Brijnandan Singh through its Partner Brijnandan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(S):-
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the instant petition be disposed of exactly in the same terms as contained in judgment dated 14.09.2022 passed by this Court in CWJC No.13024 of 2022, titled as M/s. Raghoji House of Distribution Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.
3. No objection to such prayer being allowed.
4. In the instant case, petitioner has prayed for release of amount of Rs. 53,75,537/-with interest which has be
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adhering to the Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011, and the provisions of Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in....
The government has a responsibility to protect the rights of citizens and to expedite dispensation of justice, as outlined in the Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
