Back
SANJAY KAROL, PARTHA SARTHY
Sanjay Kumar son of Shri Ramyash Ray – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):
(ii) For quashing the order as contained in Memo No. 832 dated 4.3.2022 issued under the signature of the Engineer-in-Chief (Headquarter). Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna whereby the petitioner has been blacklisted for a period of 10 years in terms of Rule 11(ka)(viii) of the Bihar Contractors Registration Rules read with departmental order No. 201 dated 14.3.2016.
(iii) For grant of any other incidental/consequential or othe
The court emphasized the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity to respond, ensuring that orders are in accordance with the rules, and maintaining proportionality in the imposition of penal....
The correctness of disclosures and declarations in tender documents is crucial, and the consequences of incorrect disclosures can lead to blacklisting.
The main legal point established is the requirement for specific notice and reasoned decision in cases of suspension or blacklisting under Rule 11 of the Bihar Contractors Registration Rules, 2007.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
