Back
P. B. BAJANTHRI, JITENDRA KUMAR
Titu Badwal S/o Late Sohan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P.B. BAJANTHRI, J.
1. Instant petition has been filed for following reliefs:
(B) For quashing the Appellate order (Annexure-20) by which the Appellate Authority has upheld the impugned order (Annexure-16). The said order is mechanical, without application of mind against the Principle of Natural justice as well as against the material on record.
(C) For staying the operation of the impugned suspension order by which the Engineer-in-Chief has suspended the petitioner's Registration No. Class-1 1190033 for 03 (Three) years vide Letter No. 4778 (Bhawan) dated 24.8.2021 as well as the Appellate order dated 01.03.2023 uphold the impugned order during the pendency of the writ application.
(D) Any other relief or relie
The main legal point established is the requirement for specific notice and reasoned decision in cases of suspension or blacklisting under Rule 11 of the Bihar Contractors Registration Rules, 2007.
The court emphasized the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity to respond, ensuring that orders are in accordance with the rules, and maintaining proportionality in the imposition of penal....
The Building Construction Department had the authority to take actions against the petitioner under the Bihar Contractors Registration Rules, 2007, and had rightly blacklisted the petitioner for subm....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
