SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 962

A. M. BADAR
Tulmul Rai @ Bisheshwar Rai S/o Late Siyasharan Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondent: Binod Bihari Singh.

JUDGMENT :

A.M. BADAR, J.

1. By this appeal, appellant/convicted accused, Tulmul Rai @ Bisheshwar Rai is challenging the Judgment and order dated 26.08.2016 and 29.08.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rosera, Samastipur, in Sessions Trial No. 286 of 2012 between the parties, thereby convicting him of the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years apart from a direction to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. For the sake of convenience, the appellant shall be referred to in his original capacity as “an accused.”

2. Facts leading to the prosecution of the accused projected from the police report can be summarized thus:

    (A) PW-5 Mr. S. (identity concealed) used to reside at village Narhan Durga Asthan falling under jurisdiction of Police Station Bibhutipur, District Samastipur. The victim of the crime in question is his 12 years old daughter PW-4 Ms. S. (identify concealed). The incident in question allegedly took place at about 11 P.M. of 12.05.2010. At that time, PW-5 Mr. S. (identity concealed) was not present at the house. He had g

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top