SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 963

A. M. BADAR
Rajendra Paswan @ Mauga S/o Late Nanhak Paswan – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vijay Kumar Sinha.

JUDGMENT :

A.M. BADAR, J.

1. By this appeal, appellant/convicted accused, Rajendra Paswan @ Mauga is challenging the Judgment and order dated 12.04.2016 passed by the learned 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya in Sessions Trial No. 50 of 2016 between the parties, thereby convicting him of the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years apart from imposition of fine of Rs. 5,000/- and default sentence of further rigorous imprisonment for two years for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. He is sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 500/- and in default to undergo imprisonment for seven days for the offence punishable under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. For the sake of convenience, the appellant shall be referred to in his original capacity as “an accused.”

2. Facts leading to the prosecution of the accused projected from the police report can be summarized thus:

    (A) First Informant-PW-6 Mr. R. (identity concealed) used to reside at village -Mohanpur under the jurisdiction of Nalanda Police Station along with his family members including his wife PW-1 Mrs. K. (identit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top