SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 578

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Md. Shamsad @ Md. Nazim, S/o. Md. Mokim – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Niraj Lochan Jha, Mr. Sunil Kumar Thakur.
For the Respondent: Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, APP, Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, APP, Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP.

JUDGMENT :

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.

These appeals have been preferred by the appellants, putting to challenge the impugned judgment of conviction dated 18.12.2019 and order of sentence dated 23.12.2019, passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur, in Trial No. 03 of 2019, arising out of Tajpur (Waini) P.S. Case No. 312 of 2016, G.R. No. 2638 of 2016, whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under :

Appellant Number

Conviction under Section

Sentence

Imprisonment

Fine (Rs.)

In default of fine

CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 356 of 2020

Md. Shamsad @ Md. Nazim

376(D) of the IPC

R.I. for 20 years

1,00,000/-

S.I. for 6 months

354 of the IPC

R.I. for 5 years

10,000/-

S.I. for 3 months

448 of the IPC

R.I. for 1 year

1,000/-

S.I. for 1 month

CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 38 of 2020

Nutan Devi

323 of the IPC

R.I. for 1 year

1,000/-

S.I. for 1 month

354 of the IPC

R.I. for 5 years

10,000/-

S.I. for 3 months

341 of the IPC

S.I. for 1 month

-

-

448 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top