IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Chakradhari Sharan Singh, Rajesh Kumar Verma, JJ.
Awadhesh Yadav, son of Late Bishwanath Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 777, 774 & 780 of 2016
Decided On : 21-06-2023
376(D) - Rape - Indian Penal Code - Section 376(D)
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted under Section 376(D) of the Indian Penal Code for gang rape. The victim alleged that she was forcibly dragged into an orchard and raped by the appellants and others. However, inconsistencies were found in the victim's statements at different stages of the case.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the evidence of the victim and her father was unreliable and inconsistent. The prosecution failed to prove the case of sexual assault and gang rape beyond reasonable doubt. Therefore, the court acquitted the appellants of the charges.
Issues: Reliability of victim's and her father's testimony, inconsistencies in the evidence, failure to prove sexual assault and gang rape beyond reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of reliable and consistent evidence in cases of sexual assault and highlighted the need for corroboration of the victim's testimony. The failure to provide scientific examination of the victim's clothes was considered fatal to the prosecution's case.
Final Decision: The impugned judgment and order convicting the appellants were set aside, and the appellants were acquitted of the charges under Section 376(D) of the IPC.
JUDGMENT :
Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.
By the impugned judgment and order dated 28.06.2016/30.06.2016, passed by learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojur, Ara in Sessions Trial No. 53 of 2015, arising out of Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 321 of 2014, GR. No. 5172 of 2014, the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:
| Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 777 of 2016 | ||||
| Appellant | Conviction under Section | Sentence | ||
| Imprisonment | Fine (Rs.) | In default of fine | ||
| Awadhesh Yadav | 376(D) of the Indian Penal Code | RI for 20 years | 50,000/- | SI for ten months |
| Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 774 of 2016 | ||||
| Appellant | Conviction under Section | Sentence | ||
| Imprisonment | Fine (Rs.) | In default of fine | ||
| Rajesh Choudhary @ Karu Choudhary
| 376(D) of the Indian Penal Code | RI for 20 years | 50,000/- | SI for ten months |
| Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 780 of 2016 | ||||
| Appellant | Conviction under Section | Sentence | ||
| Imprisonment | Fine (Rs.) | In default of fine | ||
| Anil Paswan
| 376(D) of the Indian Penal Code | RI for 20 years | 50,000/- | SI for ten months |
2. The name of the victim is not being disclosed in the present judgment that has been referred to and described as the victim/ PW-2.
3. We have heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 774 of 2016, Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 777 of 2016 and Mr. Dhananjay Singh, learned counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 780 of 2016. Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has represented the State in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 774 of 2016, Ms. Shashi Bala Verma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 777 of 2016 and Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 780 of 2016.
4. A written report of the informant (PW-2) dated 13.11.2014 addressed to the Inspector of Police-cum-Station House Officer, Jagdishpur Police Station received at 08:30 P.M. on the said date, is the basis for registration of the concerned police case i.e. Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 321/14, disclosing commission of the offences punishable under Sections 376(i), 376 (ii) (k)/34 of the I.P.C. She asserted in her written report that on 07:00 P.M. on 13.11.2014, she had gone to an orchard belonging to one Baban Choudhary (not examined), resident of Purana Pokhar, Jagdishpur for easing herself. After having eased herself when she was returning at 07:30 P.M., the accused persons namely (1) Raju Choudhary, son of Lakshman Choudhary (2) Dharmendra Ravani @ Chirai, son of Rajendra Ravani (3) Rajesh Choudhary @ Karu Choudhary (appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 774 of 2016), son of Rashbehari Choudhary, all residents of Mohalla Purana Pokhara, Ward No. 11 (4) Mukesh Choudhary, son of Hansraj Choudhary, Ward No. 11, Purana Pokhara (Kurmi Tola), Jagadishpur (5) Awadhesh Yadav (appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 777 of 2016), son of Vishwanath Yadav, resident of Middle School, Bishen Tola (Sabji Market near School), Jagadishpur, Ward No. 13 and (6) Anil Paswan (appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 780 of 2016), son of Dular Paswan, resident of Badhai Tola, Jagdishpur, Ward No. 13, came and caught her from behind and forcibly dragged her into the orchard. In the process of forceful pulling, she got scratches in both of her hands. In the orchard, all of them, after putting off her salwar committed rape upon her. On her screams, persons from the neighborhood and her family members assembled there, to whom she explained the entire occurrence.
5. It can be easily gathered from the victim’s narration of the case in the F.I.R. that the victim had the knowledge not only of the names of the accused persons but also their parentage and their respective addresses with ward numbers, as well. The rec
The appellate court acquitted the accused due to insufficient and inconsistent evidence, underscoring the necessity of reliable testimony in sexual assault cases.
The court established that a victim's testimony in sexual assault cases must be credible and supported by medical evidence to sustain a conviction.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to provide conclusive evidence and corroborative evidence to establish the guilt of the accused beyond all reas....
The reliability of witness statements and the importance of corroborating evidence in criminal cases.
Conviction for gang rape can be upheld solely based on the victim's reliable testimony, corroborated by medical evidence, regardless of inconsistencies or lack of immediate identification of the accu....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for corroborative evidence in cases of sexual offences, the admissibility of victim's statements recorded under Section 164 of the ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.