SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Chakradhari Sharan Singh, Rajesh Kumar Verma, JJ.
Awadhesh Yadav, son of Late Bishwanath Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 777, 774 & 780 of 2016
Decided On : 21-06-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate, Mr. Md.Imteyaz Ahmad, Advocate, Mr. Dhananjay Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. Shashi Bala Verma, APP, Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, APP, Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, APP

IMPORTANT POINT
The importance of reliable and consistent evidence, the need for corroboration of the victim's testimony, and the requirement for scientific examination of evidence in cases of sexual assault.

Headnote:

376(D) - Rape - Indian Penal Code - Section 376(D)

Fact of the Case:

The appellants were convicted under Section 376(D) of the Indian Penal Code for gang rape. The victim alleged that she was forcibly dragged into an orchard and raped by the appellants and others. However, inconsistencies were found in the victim's statements at different stages of the case.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the evidence of the victim and her father was unreliable and inconsistent. The prosecution failed to prove the case of sexual assault and gang rape beyond reasonable doubt. Therefore, the court acquitted the appellants of the charges.

Issues: Reliability of victim's and her father's testimony, inconsistencies in the evidence, failure to prove sexual assault and gang rape beyond reasonable doubt

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of reliable and consistent evidence in cases of sexual assault and highlighted the need for corroboration of the victim's testimony. The failure to provide scientific examination of the victim's clothes was considered fatal to the prosecution's case.

Final Decision: The impugned judgment and order convicting the appellants were set aside, and the appellants were acquitted of the charges under Section 376(D) of the IPC.

JUDGMENT :

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.

By the impugned judgment and order dated 28.06.2016/30.06.2016, passed by learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojur, Ara in Sessions Trial No. 53 of 2015, arising out of Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 321 of 2014, GR. No. 5172 of 2014, the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:

Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 777 of 2016

Appellant

Conviction under Section

Sentence

Imprisonment

Fine (Rs.)

In default of fine

Awadhesh Yadav

376(D) of the Indian Penal Code

RI for 20 years

50,000/-

SI for ten months

Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 774 of 2016

Appellant

Conviction under Section

Sentence

Imprisonment

Fine (Rs.)

In default of fine

Rajesh Choudhary @ Karu Choudhary

 

376(D) of the Indian Penal Code

RI for 20 years

50,000/-

SI for ten months

Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 780 of 2016

Appellant

Conviction under Section

Sentence

Imprisonment

Fine (Rs.)

In default of fine

Anil Paswan

 

376(D) of the Indian Penal Code

RI for 20 years

50,000/-

SI for ten months

2. The name of the victim is not being disclosed in the present judgment that has been referred to and described as the victim/ PW-2.

3. We have heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 774 of 2016, Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 777 of 2016 and Mr. Dhananjay Singh, learned counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 780 of 2016. Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has represented the State in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 774 of 2016, Ms. Shashi Bala Verma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 777 of 2016 and Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 780 of 2016.

4. A written report of the informant (PW-2) dated 13.11.2014 addressed to the Inspector of Police-cum-Station House Officer, Jagdishpur Police Station received at 08:30 P.M. on the said date, is the basis for registration of the concerned police case i.e. Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 321/14, disclosing commission of the offences punishable under Sections 376(i), 376 (ii) (k)/34 of the I.P.C. She asserted in her written report that on 07:00 P.M. on 13.11.2014, she had gone to an orchard belonging to one Baban Choudhary (not examined), resident of Purana Pokhar, Jagdishpur for easing herself. After having eased herself when she was returning at 07:30 P.M., the accused persons namely (1) Raju Choudhary, son of Lakshman Choudhary (2) Dharmendra Ravani @ Chirai, son of Rajendra Ravani (3) Rajesh Choudhary @ Karu Choudhary (appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 774 of 2016), son of Rashbehari Choudhary, all residents of Mohalla Purana Pokhara, Ward No. 11 (4) Mukesh Choudhary, son of Hansraj Choudhary, Ward No. 11, Purana Pokhara (Kurmi Tola), Jagadishpur (5) Awadhesh Yadav (appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 777 of 2016), son of Vishwanath Yadav, resident of Middle School, Bishen Tola (Sabji Market near School), Jagadishpur, Ward No. 13 and (6) Anil Paswan (appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 780 of 2016), son of Dular Paswan, resident of Badhai Tola, Jagdishpur, Ward No. 13, came and caught her from behind and forcibly dragged her into the orchard. In the process of forceful pulling, she got scratches in both of her hands. In the orchard, all of them, after putting off her salwar committed rape upon her. On her screams, persons from the neighborhood and her family members assembled there, to whom she explained the entire occurrence.

5. It can be easily gathered from the victim’s narration of the case in the F.I.R. that the victim had the knowledge not only of the names of the accused persons but also their parentage and their respective addresses with ward numbers, as well. The rec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top