SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 661

SANDEEP KUMAR
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Bhairaw Nand Sharma.
For the Respondents: Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12.

Sandeep Kumar, J. – By way of this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 03.03.2021 passed by the Additional Collector, Land Reforms, Aurangabad (respondent no 6) as well as connected orders dated 01.07.2020 and 03.07.2020 jointly passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Aurangabad and the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Aurangabad (respondent nos. 7 and 8) and also orders dated 15.11.2017 and 24.01.2020 passed by the Circle Officer, Barun (respondent no.9) by which the award/compensation to the petitioners for their land, which has been acquired, has been rejected.

2. It is the case of the petitioners that they had purchased a piece of Raiayati/Khatyani land bearing Khata no.55 plot no.37, Thana no.146, an area measuring 66 decimals situated at Mauza-Dayalpur, P.S and Circle-Barun, District- Aurangabad, through a registered sale deed dated 26.09.2012 and thereafter, the petitioners came in peaceful possession over the said land. Thereafter, the said land was mutated in the name of the petitioners. According to the petitioners, the land in question was in peaceful possession of the ancestors of sellers/vendors through an unregistered Hukumnama before abolition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top