SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 673

SANDEEP KUMAR
Anju Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Priya Gupta.
For the Respondents: Mr.Sajid Salim Khan (SC 25).

Sandeep Kumar, J. –

Re. I.A. No. 1 of 2020

The present interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking amendment in the prayer portion of the writ petition.

2. For the reasons mentioned in the interlocutory (I.A. No. 1 of 2020), the same is allowed.

3. Accordingly, the averments made in the I.A. No. 1 of 2020 shall be treated to be the part of the main petition.

Re. I.A. No. 4 of 2021

4. The present interlocutory application has been filed for substitution of heirs and legal representatives of the Petitioner No. 1 (Smt. Anju Kumari) who died on 09.12.2020 leaving behind her heirs and legal representatives.

5. For the reasons mentioned in the interlocutory application, this interlocutory application (I.A. No. 4 of 2021) is allowed.

6. The heirs and legal representatives of the Petitioner No. 1 (Smt. Anju Kumari) as mentioned in paragraph No. 2 of the present interlocutory application be substituted in her place and the name of Petitioner No. 1 (Smt. Anju Kumari) be expunged from the array of the parties.

Re. C.W.J.C. No. 4523 of 2020

7. Heard the parties.

8. The present application has been filed for following reliefs: –

(i) For quashing of the order dated 18.01.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top