SANDEEP KUMAR
Anju Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Sandeep Kumar, J. –
Re. I.A. No. 1 of 2020
The present interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking amendment in the prayer portion of the writ petition.
2. For the reasons mentioned in the interlocutory (I.A. No. 1 of 2020), the same is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the averments made in the I.A. No. 1 of 2020 shall be treated to be the part of the main petition.
Re. I.A. No. 4 of 2021
4. The present interlocutory application has been filed for substitution of heirs and legal representatives of the Petitioner No. 1 (Smt. Anju Kumari) who died on 09.12.2020 leaving behind her heirs and legal representatives.
5. For the reasons mentioned in the interlocutory application, this interlocutory application (I.A. No. 4 of 2021) is allowed.
6. The heirs and legal representatives of the Petitioner No. 1 (Smt. Anju Kumari) as mentioned in paragraph No. 2 of the present interlocutory application be substituted in her place and the name of Petitioner No. 1 (Smt. Anju Kumari) be expunged from the array of the parties.
Re. C.W.J.C. No. 4523 of 2020
7. Heard the parties.
8. The present application has been filed for following reliefs: –
(i) For quashing of the order dated 18.01.
Long-standing Jamabandi cannot be cancelled in summary proceedings as it undermines previously established property rights without due process.
The authority under the Bihar Right to Public Grievances Redressal Act, 2015 did not have the jurisdiction to cancel the long-standing Jamabandi in a summary proceeding and the cancellation violated ....
Long-standing Jamabandi cannot be cancelled in a summary proceeding and the DCLR has no jurisdiction to cancel the Jamabandi.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.