RAJIV ROY
Firoz Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
Heard Mr. Jai Ram Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prasoon Sinha, who represent the Patna Municipal Corporation.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief: –
for issuance of writ in the nature of CERTIORARI for setting aside the order dated 28.05.2019 passed by Learned Municipal Commissioner in vigilance case no- 46(B)/2016 particularly regarding for imposition of five times "Arth dand" of Rs 1,29,170 (one lakh twenty nine thousand one hundred seventy) over and above the calculation of compounding and condonation fee of Municipal Commissioner as well as order dated 22.06.2022 passed by learned Municipal Building Tribunal-1 (hereafter referred as Tribunal) in Appeal no-19(N)/2019, who has held not to interfere in this regard being beyond its jurisdiction and also to set aside the order dated 22.06.2022 for imposing fine Rs.1,00,000/-( one lakh) under section 315 of the Bihar Municipal Act 2007 by quashing the order vide memo no 2632 dated 12.03.2016 of Patna Municipal Corporation.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has straight away taken this Court to Annexure-2 to the petition i.e. an order a bench of Patna High Court in C.W.J.C. No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.