SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 722

RAJIV ROY
Firoz Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Jai Ram Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Indeshwari Prasad, GA-3.
For PMC : Mr. Prasoon Sinha.

ORDER

Heard Mr. Jai Ram Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prasoon Sinha, who represent the Patna Municipal Corporation.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief: –

for issuance of writ in the nature of CERTIORARI for setting aside the order dated 28.05.2019 passed by Learned Municipal Commissioner in vigilance case no- 46(B)/2016 particularly regarding for imposition of five times "Arth dand" of Rs 1,29,170 (one lakh twenty nine thousand one hundred seventy) over and above the calculation of compounding and condonation fee of Municipal Commissioner as well as order dated 22.06.2022 passed by learned Municipal Building Tribunal-1 (hereafter referred as Tribunal) in Appeal no-19(N)/2019, who has held not to interfere in this regard being beyond its jurisdiction and also to set aside the order dated 22.06.2022 for imposing fine Rs.1,00,000/-( one lakh) under section 315 of the Bihar Municipal Act 2007 by quashing the order vide memo no 2632 dated 12.03.2016 of Patna Municipal Corporation.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has straight away taken this Court to Annexure-2 to the petition i.e. an order a bench of Patna High Court in C.W.J.C. No

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top