ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Prushotam Yadav @ Chotu – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Anil Kumar Sinha, J. – The petitioner, who is an accused in Sessions Trial No. 82 of 2020, has filed the present application, under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for setting aside the order, dated 10.05.2022, passed in Misc. Transfer Case No. 76 of 2022, whereby the records of Sessions Trial No. 82 of 2020 has been transferred from 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Naugachia Sub- Division, Bhagalpur, to 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur, at the instance of the informant/Opposite Party No. 2.
2. The main submission advanced by learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner is that the record of Sessions Trial No. 82 of 2020 has been transferred without any notice to the petitioner by the learned Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur. The prayer for transfer of the records of Sessions Trial No. 82 of 2020 from Naugachia to Bhagalpur at the instance of the informant/Opposite Party No. 2 was dismissed earlier on three occasions on identical facts by the learned Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur. In support of his argument, learned Senior Counsel relies upon a decision of the Supreme Court, in the case of Nirmal Singh vs. State of Haryana, reported in (1996) 6 SCC 126.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.