PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Surendra Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, State and private respondent i.e. respondent no. 5.
2. This writ application has been filed for setting aside the order dated 09.11.2022 passed by the Respondent no.2/Sub-Divisional Officer, Triveniganj, District-Supaul and Respondent no.3/Sub-Divisional Police officer, Triveniganj, District-Supaul in Sub-Divisional Janta Darbar, as contained in Annexure – 4, whereby the Anchal Adhikari, Chhatapur has been directed to measure and demarcate the land in question situated at Mauza Kathi, P.S. Chhatapur, District Supaul, bearing Khata No. 164 Plot No. 135/752/784/785 Area 20 decimal after deposition of measurement fee in presence of the parties.
3. It is the contention of the petitioners that in C.S. Khatian, Plot no.135 having area of 6 acres 59 decimals alongwith other plots under Khata no.14 was recorded in the names of Parbat Pandey, Kanak Pandey, Teu Pandey, Siyaram Pandey and Gauri Pandey. Out of 6 acres and 59 decimals in said plot no.135, the recorded tenant namely Siyaram Pandey transferred two separate pieces of lands having area of 13 kathas and 1 bigha 17% kathas in favour of one Basudeo Yadav through registered deed of sale on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.