SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 801

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Kanhaiya Patel @ Kanhaiya Prasad Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Vijay Kumar Singh, Abhinav Shandilya.
For the Respondents: Mr. Manoj Kumar, AC to GP-4.

Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Petitioner in the present case seeking the following reliefs: –

“(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the decision of State Remission Board dated 20.04.2023, so far it relates to the petitioner, whereby and where under the State Remission Board was pleased to reject the proposal of the petitioner for his premature release on the ground that there is no favourable report of the Presiding Officer of the learned convicting court.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus, commanding and directing the Respondent Authorities to grant premature release to the petitioner, who convicted for life vide judgment and order dated 11/12.08.2009 passed in Sessions Case No. 854 of 2005 arising out of Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 193 of 2005 by the learned 4th Additional District and sessions Judge, West Champaran, Bettiah on the ground that the petitioner had already completed 14 years of his physical incarceration on 10.10.2019


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top