IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
P.B. BAJANTHRI, ARUN KUMAR JHA, JJ.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health and Family Department and Anr. – Appellants
Versus
Arvind Kumar, Son of Bijay Chaudhary and Ors. – Respondents
Letters Patent Appeal No.158 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22551 of 2019 with Letters Patent Appeal No. 1708 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22551 of 2019
Decided On : 10-01-2023
Pharmacist Qualification - Bihar Pharmacist Cadre Rules - Rule 6, Rule 7, Appendix-1
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a dispute regarding the eligibility of candidates with B.Pharma and M.Pharma qualifications to apply for the post of Pharmacist under the Bihar Pharmacist Cadre Rules, 2014. The State of Bihar and Arvind Kumar filed L.P.As. against the order of the learned Single Judge, which allowed candidates with B.Pharma/M.Pharma qualifications to apply for the post.
Finding of the Court:
The court analyzed Rules 6 and 7 of the Bihar Pharmacist Cadre Rules, 2014, which prescribed the qualifications for the post of Pharmacist. The court held that candidates with B.Pharma and M.Pharma qualifications, without possessing a Diploma in Pharmacy, were not eligible to participate in the selection and appointment process for the post of Pharmacist. The court set aside the order of the learned Single Judge and rejected the writ petition filed by Sanjeev Kumar Mishra.
Issues: The main issue was whether candidates with B.Pharma and M.Pharma qualifications, without possessing a Diploma in Pharmacy, were eligible to apply for the post of Pharmacist under the Bihar Pharmacist Cadre Rules, 2014.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Rules 6 and 7 along with Appendix-1 of the Bihar Pharmacist Cadre Rules, 2014 to determine the eligibility criteria for the post of Pharmacist. It emphasized that the basic qualification of Diploma in Pharmacy was mandatory, and candidates with B.Pharma and M.Pharma qualifications could not apply without fulfilling this requirement.
Final Decision: The court set aside the order of the learned Single Judge and rejected the writ petition filed by Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, thereby allowing the L.P.As. filed by the State of Bihar and Arvind Kumar.
JUDGMENT :
(P.B. Bajanthri, J.)
Re:-I.A. No. 01 of 2020 & I.A. No. 04 of 2022 (arising out of L.P.A. No. 158 of 2020)
1. Heard Interlocutory Applications for condonation of delay in filing present L.P.As.
2. For the reasons stated in the application and affidavit, delay of about 40 days is condoned.
3. Accordingly I.A. No. 01 of 2020 and I.A. No. 04 of 2022 for condonation of delay and rectification of I.A. No. 01 of 2020 are allowed.
4. With the consent of the learned counsels for respective parties matter is taken up for final disposal.
5. These two L.P.As. are filed by the State of Bihar and Arvind Kumar. They are aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge dated 10.12.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 22551 of 2019 (Sanjeev Kumar Mishra Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.).
6. Appellant-Arvind Kumar is holder of Diploma in Pharmacy. On the other hand, Respondents-Sanjeev Kumar Mishra & Ors. were holders of M.Pharma/B. Pharma. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra in his C.W.J.C. No. 22551 of 2019 has prayed for following reliefs:-
(b) For issuance of an appropriate writ, directing and commanding upon the respondent authorities to provide necessary option for registration for candidates/Petitioner having Bachelors in Pharmacy degree for Advertisement No. 07/2019 dated 25/10/19 issued by the Executive Director, State Health Society, Bihar for the post of Pharmacist.
(c) For any other relief/reliefs which this Hon'ble Court deems fit."
7. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ application of Sanjeev Kumar Mishra with following directions (para 39):-
8. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid direction, appellant -Arvind Kumar and the State are in L.P.A.
9. Brief facts of the case are that both appellant-Arvind Kumar and Respondent-Sanjeev Kumar Mishra intend to participate in the process of selection and appointment to the post of Pharmacist pursuant to Advertisement No. 07/2019. The post of Pharmacist is governed by the rules called "Bihar Pharmacist Cadre Rules, 2014" (For short Rules, 2014) issued under Article 309 of Constitution. We passed the following order on 26.09.2022 and 09.11.2022 in C.W.J.C. No. 7120 of 2021 which was delinked on 09.11.2022.
Order dated 26.09.2022 reads as under:-
Core issue involved in the present petition is whether Respondents/petitioners are entitled to participate in the process of selection and appointment to the post Pharmacist in the light of Rules called “Bihar Pharmacist Cadre Rules, 2014” (For short “Rules, 2014”).
Rule 6 of Rules, 2014 provides for qualification which reads as under:
“6. Qualifications. -(1) For appointment by direct recruitment to the basic category posts, minimum educational qualification shall be Intermediate/10+2 (Science) pass and passing in al
(1) Appointment of Pharmacists – Prescription of eligibility criteria of 10+2 with Diploma in Pharmacy by State cannot be said to be arbitrary or irrational – Rule 6(1) is Constitutionally valid.(2) ....
Recruitment Rules cannot be at variance with the Regulations prescribed by the Pharmacy Council of India for essential qualifications for appointment as a Pharmacist.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.