NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Arjun Kumar Son Of Suresh Sah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month. I have already heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the informant and also the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Muzaffarpur Mahila P.S. Case No. 61 of 2020, registered for offence punishable under sections 341, 493, 376, 323, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecutrix has made allegation that the present petitioner exploited her sexually for ten years after giving promise to marry with her. She became pregnant and gave birth to a male child. At the time of lodging of the FIR, the male child was aged about five years. The prosecutrix came to know that the petitioner has solemnized his marriage stealthily with another girl. When she inquired, the petitioner assaulted and throttled her and also threatened her to face dire consequence, had she complained the occurrence to anyone. The petitioner remained absconding during investigation and charge-sheet was submitted showing him absconder.
2. The learned counsel for the informant has submitted that the petiti
Adri Dharan Das vs State of West Bengal reported in (2005) 4 SCC 303
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and Another vs N.R. Vairamani & Others
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia etc. Vs. The State of Punjab
Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2012) 8 SCC 730
Prem Shankar Prasad vs. the State of Bihar and another
Sushila Aggarwal and Others vs State (NCT of Delhi) And Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.