SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 1037

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, PARTHA SARTHY
Bigani Devi @ Bigani Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ramchandra Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA-7.

Partha Sarthy, J. – Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The instant appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 2.8.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge allowing CWJC no.8057 of 2018.

3. The facts in brief are that the respondent no.8 herein along with the appellant and others applied for the post of Anganwari Sevika and Sahayika for Code no.18, Gram Panchayat Kauriram, Block Mohania, in the district of Kaimur against the advertisement dated 30.5.2023 issued by the District Magistrate, Kaimur. The respondent no.8 was not appointed on which she moved before the District Programme Officer, Kaimur who also rejected her claim for appointment on the post of Anganwari Sevika. The appeal preferred by her being Anganwari Appeal Case no.13 of 2015-16 was rejected by order dated 23.3.2018 passed by the District Magistrate, Kaimur. She challenged the orders of the District Programme Officer and the District Magistrate in a writ application being CWJC no.8057 of 2018 which was allowed by judgment dated 2.8.2019. It is against this order that the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant (respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top