Back
P. B. BAJANTHRI, RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
Excellent Construction – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
P. B. Bajanthri, J. – In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: –
“(i) For quashing the order dated 01.03.2023 passed by the Managing Director, B.S.E.I.D.C, Patna (Respondent No.3) whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been rejected and the order of blacklisting dated 11.01.2023 has been affirmed.
(ii) For quashing the order dated 11.01.2023 passed by the Chief Engineer, B.S.E.I.D.C. (Respondent No.4) whereby the Registration of the petitioner M/s. Excellent Construction has been blacklisted for a period of ten (10) years from the date of order on the ground that the experience certificate produced by him is wrong and forge.
And for any other relief(s) for which the petitioner are found to be entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. The petitioner has been blacklisted for alleged production of fake experience certificate or requisite document for the purpose of participating in Bid process. Petitioner has invoked remedy of Appeal before the Appellate Authority against the blacklisting order for a period of ten years and it was decided by the Appellate Authority-cum-Managing Director, Bihar State Educational Infrastructure Develo
The impugned actions of issuing the show cause notice and blacklisting the petitioner were arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violated principles of natural justice. The court emphasized the requiremen....
The court emphasized the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity to respond, ensuring that orders are in accordance with the rules, and maintaining proportionality in the imposition of penal....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
