SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 16

PARTHA SARTHY
Nishi Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Shekhar Singh, Praveen Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Shankar Kumar Thakur, A.C. to G.P.27.

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following relief(s):—

“(i) For issuance of appropriate writ/order/direction including the writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned memo no. 2376/Siwan dated 8.8.2015 (as contained in annexure-1) issued under the signature of District Education Officer, Siwan (respondent no.3) whereby and where under the services of the petitioner has been terminated without conducting any departmental proceeding or given any opportunity of hearing on frivolous and unreasonable ground ignoring the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as also the Guideline as issued by the State Govt. itself in the year 1988/89.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs in the nature of Mandamus for commanding/directing the official respondents to take the petitioner back in to her services and not to disturb her from performing her duty and to make payment of her salary with all the arrears on regular basis.

(iii) For grant of any other relief/reliefs for which petitioner deemed entitled to.”

3. The case of the petitioner in brief is that having p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top