Back
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
P. Sasintharani – Appellant
Versus
Director of School Education, Chennai – Respondent
ORDER :
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the third respondent District Educational Officer in Mu. Mu. No. 5495/Aa2/2016 dated 31.07.2017, quash the same and further direct the third respondent District Educational Officer to approve forthwith the appointment of the petitioner as B.T. Assistant (History) in the fifth respondent school namely Union Christian Higher Secondary School (TELC), Madurai w.e.f. the date of her appointment viz. 22.08.2013 and disburse the staff grant towards her salary from the said date with all attendant benefits.
1. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the third respondent dated 31.07.2017, rejecting the proposal submitted by the fifth respondent school seeking for approval for the appointment of the petitioner in the fifth respondent school as B.T. Assistant [History] with effect from the date of her appointment namely 22.08.2013, on the ground that there are surplus teachers in the fifth respondent school.
2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order on t
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to prior court directives in appointment approvals, particularly considering the timing of the petitioner's appointment relative to the surplus teacher ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that obtaining permission from the competent authority before making an appointment in an educational institution is crucial for approval, and the ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
