Back
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Rajnish Kumar Mishra Son of Brahmchari Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Patna University.
2. Let the rejoinder be taken on the record.
3. This writ application has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-
ii. For further issue an appropriate writ/s, order/s, direction/s in the nature of mandamus to declared the petition a pass candidate after re-checking the assignment answer-sheet of the petitioner in Psychology 7th paper of B.A. (Hons) – Part – III because the petitioner has rightly attempted and explained the answer and also assessed himself that he will secured minimum passing marks i.e. 45% but in spite of that the respondents have illegally given Zero (O) marks in Assignment of 7th paper (Psychology) B.A. (Hons) Part – III Examination.
iii. For further issue a suitable compensation to the petitioner for his mental harassment and reputa
A candidate's right to request re-evaluation is not guaranteed and must align with the governing rules; judicial review in academic evaluations is limited to ensuring procedural fairness, not merit.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the opportunity for re-evaluation of answer sheets cannot be claimed as a right, but is available only if the rules governing the examination ....
Re-evaluation of answer scripts is only permissible when the difference in marks exceeds 20%, as per statutory provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
