CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Ramjeet Yadav @ Ranjit Yadav, S/o. Late Gumani Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.
The victim's name and her parentage is not being disclosed in the present judgment and order.
2. By the impugned judgment and order dated 01.02.2021/ 08.02.2021 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Exclusive Judge(POCSO), Aurangabad in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 07/2017, GR No. 08/2017, CIS No. 08/2017, the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under :
| Conviction under Section | Sentence | ||
| Imprisonment | Fine (Rs.) | In default of fine | |
| 342/34 of the IPC | SI for six months | X | X |
| 504/34 of the IPC | SI for six months | X | X |
| 307/34 of the IPC | RI for ten years | 5,000/- | SI for three months |
| 376-D of the IPC | RI for 20 years | 20,000/- | SI for three months |
| 4 of POCSO Act | X | X | X |
| 3(1)(r) of SC/ST Act | SI for six months | X | X |
| 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act | SI for six months | X | X |
All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.
3. The victim is the informant (PW-3), based on whose fardbayan recorded by the Sub-Inspector of Police-cum-SHO, Mahila Police Station Shakuntala Kumari (PW-7), Aurangabad Mahila Police Station Case No. 7 of 2017 was registered on 18.03.2017 disclosing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.