Manish Kumar, Son of Vijaymal Ram VS State of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Manish Kumar, Son of Vijaymal Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vikram Deo Singh, Mr. Shankar Kumar.
For the Respondent: Km. Shashi Bala Verma.

JUDGMENT :

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.)

This appeal has been preferred under Section 374(2) of the CrPC against the judgment of conviction dated 17.06.2021 and the order of sentence dated 23.06.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VIth-cum-Special Judge POCSO Act, Kaimur (Bhabhua), in POCSO Case No. 13 of 2020 arising out of Mahila (Bhabhua) P.S. Case No. 12 of 2020, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:

Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 476 of 2021
	Convicted under Sections	Sentence
		Imprisonment	Fine (Rs.)	In default of fine
Manish Kumar	376 of the IPC	R.I. for Ten years	10,000/-	R.I. for six months
	323 of the IPC	R.I. for One year	1,000/-	R.I. for three months
	341 of the IPC	S.I. for one month	-	-
	Section 4 of the POCSO Act	R.I. for 12 years	10,000/-	R.I. for six months

2. All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.

3. The victim is the informant (PW-2), whose name has not been disclosed in the present the judgment and order. We have taken utmost care to ensure that the name of her parents, who have deposed at the trial as witnesses, do not appear in the judgment so as to prote

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEYManish Kumar, Son of Vijaymal Ram – AppellantVersusState of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Manish Kumar, Son of Vijaymal Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent