SANDEEP KUMAR
Rahul Kumar, S/o Jeebach Prasad Roy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State. None appears for complainant despite valid service of notice.
2. This application has been filed for quashing of the order dated 29.05.2017 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Complaint Case No. 1608 of 2016 by which learned Magistrate has taken cognizance against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 323, 504 and 417 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Prosecution story in short is that the complainant namely Nikhil Kumar Singh had purchased an Indigo Car through Tata Motors Finance Limited, Anugrahpuri Colony in year 2014 in which the said Finance company financed a loan amounting to Rs. 5,32,658/-to the complainant, out of which Rs. 3,49,672/-was paid by the son of complainant. On 28.07.2015, son of the complainant was driving the vehicle which was financed by the said company met with an accident and in the said accident he died. After death of the complainant’s son, the said company threatened and pressurized the complainant to repay the rest amount. It is further alleged by complainant that amount of insurance of the said car has been grabbed by the petitioners who have been compe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.