IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA, J.
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.456 of 2020
(12.12.2023)
Mahesh Prasad ... Appellant
vs.
State of Bihar ... Respondent
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Section 20(b)(ii)(c), 52-A(2)(b) and 54 – Standing Instruction No. 1 of 1988 dated 15.03.1988 of Narcotics Control Bureau, Government of India – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 374(2) – Seizure of Charas – Conviction and sentence – Samples were admittedly not drawn in presence of a Magistrate, as contemplated under Section 52-A(2)(b) of Act, which is mandatory requirement – Representative samples were not drawn from seized substance and sent to expert in designated laboratory for chemical analysis and report in accordance with law – Seized substance and samples were not handled properly in prescribed manner and it was mixed-up before taking its weight – Entire investigation of case was perfunctory – Defects in investigation are substantial and go to root of identity of alleged contraband – Case of prosecution is based only on oral testimony of official witnesses with arrest of appellant/convict – Evidence adduced during trial does not inspire confidence – No seizure list witnesses were examined during trial and seized contraband were not produced before court – Prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond all reasonable doubts against appellant/convict – Impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence set aside – Appeal allowed. (Paras 34, 39, 45, 47, 48 and 49)
Chandra Shekhar Jha, J. – Heard Mr. Jitendra Singh, learned senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. Abha Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The present appeal preferred under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short the ‘Cr.P.C.’) challenging the judgment and order of conviction dated 15.10.2019 and order of sentence dated 21.10.2019, respectively as passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari in N.D.P.S. Case No. 11 of 2017, CIS No. 56 of 2017 arising out of Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 13 of 2017, whereunder appellant-accused was convicted and sentenced for offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the “N.D.P.S. Act”) and ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten (10) years with a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, the appellant shall undergo R.I. for six months respectively.
3. As per the prosecution story, while the informant, who is ASI in SSB 47th B.N. Jalgama, was checking the vehicle on 11.09.2017 at about 11:00 O’Clock on road in front of Chhouradano Block, a Tata Magic vehicle bearing Reg. No. BR05 G 3797 was intercepted on which two persons were boarded, thereafter, one blue coloured bag containing ‘Charas’ was recovered from the apprehended person namely, Md. Mujamil. On being weighed it was found 4.6 Kg. One mobile phone was also recovered from the possession of said Md. Mujamil. On search of another person namely, Mahesh Prasad (the appellant), who was driver of the said vehicle, a mobile phone was recovered from him. On asking, both the apprehended persons did not give any satisfactory answer or paper of having contraband ‘Charas’ which was found in their possession. Thereafter, seizure list was prepared in presence of witnesses.
4. On the basis of the aforesaid, Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 13 of 2017 was registered under Section 18, 20, 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act on 19.01.2017 against the accused persons. After investigation, charge-sheet no. 109/2017 dated 10.09.2017 was submitted under Sections 18, 20, 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act in the court of learned District Judge-cum-Special Judge, Motihari. The case record of one co-accused Md. Mujamil was separated and sent to J.J. Board, Motihari and only accused Mahesh Prasad (appellant) has faced trial in this case.
5. On the basis of material collected during investigation learned trial court framed charges under Section 20(b)(ii)(c), 23(c) of the N.D.P.S. Act against the appellant/convict, which he pleaded “not guilty” and claimed trial.
6. To substantiate its case, prosecution examined total of six witnesses in support of the prosecution case. They are Parsun Kumar Murmu (PW-1), who is constable of SSB, Ganesh Das (PW-2), who is also constable of the SSB, Dinesh Singh Rawat (PW-3) is the head constable of SSB, Asim Barmudai (PW-4), who is ASI in SSB and also informant of this case, Paras Raut (PW-5) who is head constable of SSB and Azaj Alam (PW-6) who is the Investigating Officer of this case.
7. The prosecution has produced and relied upo following documentary evidences as to substantiate its case during trial, which are as under:
| Exhibit Nos. | List of documents |
| Exhibit-1 | Performa of Seizure list |
| Exhibit-2 | Performa of arrest |
| Exhibit-3 | Details of SSB Personnel, who were in raiding team |
| Exhibit-4 | Personal search memo |
| Exhibit-5 | Proforma of intercepted goods |
| Exhibit-6 | Notice for search u/s 50 of NDPS Act |
| Exhibit-7 | Kabulnama of accused |
| Exhibit-8 | Written application of informant |
| Exhibit-9 | Production cum seizure list |
| Exhibit-10 | Arrest memo of accused Mahesh Prasad |
| Exhibit-11 | Forwarding petition of RFSL, Muzaffarpur |
| Exhibit-12 | Forwarding petition to CFSL Calcutta |
| Exhibit-13 | Authorizatio |
Tofan Singh vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Gorakh Nath Prasad vs. State of Bihar
Ashok alias Dangra Jaiswal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Haryana vs. Jarnail Singh
Non-compliance with the procedure for drawing up the sample of the narcotic, lack of compliance with the prescribed procedure under the NDPS Act, 1985 at all the stages, and the case being based on t....
The judgment established the significance of producing seized materials as evidence, proper sampling and handling of contraband, and compliance with N.D.P.S. Act provisions for maintaining the credib....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for compliance with procedural safeguards and fair procedure in the investigation and trial of cases under the NDPS Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.