BIBEK CHAUDHURI
Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Bibek Chaudhuri, J. – Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
2. It will be profitable to state the background of the instant revision, at the outset before dealing with the impugned order to come a decision, as to whether the impugned order is illegal, inoperative and inefficient.
3. On the basis of a Police report a case under Section 498A/341/323/504/34 of the I.P.C. read with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act was registered against the petitioner. The petitioner prayed for anticipatory bail before this Court. A Coordinate Bench in Cr. Misc. No. 24900 of 2017, disposed of the said application for anticipatory bail vide order dated 4th September, 2017 with the following direction: –
“In view of such, this application is disposed off with direction to petitioner to surrender before the Court below i.e. Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate/concerned court, Hilsa, DistrictNalanda within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Ekangarsarai P.S. Case No. 11 of 2017, along with Affidavit that he will keep the wife with full dignity and care. In the event the Court below finds that petitioner is willing to keep his wife with f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.