RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Sunny Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J. - The applicant has filed this first application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail.
The applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No.157 of 2022 registered at Police Station City Kotwali, Morena in relation to the offences punishable under Sections 498-a, 294, 506, 34 of IPC and under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition act.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in the case. There is no specific allegation against the applicant and there are only omnibus and vague allegations levelled against the applicant. It is further submitted that the co-accused persons have been granted benefit of anticipatory bail by the trial Court. The applicant is ready to cooperate with the investigation and ready to abide by all the conditions which may be granted by this Court while granting anticipatory bail. Hence, prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.
Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the submissions and submitted that considering the nature of allegations, the applicant is not entitled for grant of anticipatory bai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.