Back
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Syed Mokhtar Hussain – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J. – Heard Mr. Siya Ram Shahi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Y. V. Giri, learned senior counsel for the respondent-National Institute of Technology assisted by Mr. S.K. Giri and Mr. Sujeet Kumar Sinha, learned Central Government Counsel for the Union of India.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the letter no. NITP/1653/14 dated 27.06.2014 (Annexure-12) issued by the respondent no.3 whereby the representation dated 31.03.2014 filed by the petitioner in the light of the order dated 12.03.2014 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 24092 of 2013 has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner further prays for issuance of the appropriate direction upon the respondent to put the petitioner in the pensionable service as petitioner is not a new appointee in the service of National Institute of Technology (hereinafter referred to N.I.T.) Patna rather his service has been observed in the N.I.T. w.e.f. 28.01.2004. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to an advertisement issued by the Coordinator, Transportation Engineering, B.C.E. Patna on 21.01.1987, the petitioner was initially appointed as Technical Assistant on 05.03.1987 by t
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the National Pension System (NPS) is applicable only to new recruits entering service post 01.01.2004, and as the petitioners were appointed b....
The exclusion of service rendered by an employee on the work-charged establishment or daily wager from Section 2 of the U.P. Act No.1 of 2021 is hit by Article 14 of the Constitution of India for the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
