SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Awadhesh Kumar Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vikram Bahadur Yadav, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has assailed the order dated 31.05.2022 passed by the respondent no.5-Executive Engineer, Investigation & Planning (Water Resources), Division Mirzapur (Fatehi Irrigation Colony), Mirzapur to the extent the benefit of pension to the petitioner has been converted into new pension and further prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to include the service rendered by him as daily-wager and in work-charged establishment with regular service and grant benefit of Old Pension Scheme to the petitioner.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was initially engaged as a daily wager on the post of Gaze Reader on 01.05.1989. Due to the promotion of employees, some posts fell vacant. The Superintending Engineer issued a letter dated 24.07.1997, addressed to the Executive Engineer, forwarding the names of the daily wage employees who have completed 240 days in service and were found eligible by the Selection Committee for being appointed on said vacant posts. The name of the petitione
Chairman, Railway Board and Others Vs. C.R. Rangadhamaiah & Others
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Vs. Bachan Singh
Punjab Land and Recreation Corporator Ltd. v. Presiding Officer Labour Court
Prem Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others (2019) 10 SCC 516
State of U.P v. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd.
State of Gujarat & Another Vs. Raman Lal Keshav Lal Soni & Other
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.