SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 161

CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Bengali Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Amicus Curiae.
For the Respondent: Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta, APP.

Chandra Shekhar Jha, J. – The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants-convict under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘CrPC’) challenging the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.11.2003 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track (Additional) Court, Nalanda, Bihar Sharif in S.T. No.51 of 1991/Tr. No.70 of 2002 arising out of Rahui P.S. Case No.2 of 1990, whereby the trial court has convicted both the above-named appellants under Sections 304-B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for ten years under Section 304-B of IPC and simple imprisonment for three years under Section 201 of the IPC respectively with a fine of Rs.5000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo imprisonment for two and half years. All the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.

2. The case of prosecution, in brief, as it appears from the written information that the informant, namely, Amrit Ram/PW-7, when visited the matrimonial village of his daughter in connection with some other work, he met with his ‘samdhi’, who respo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top