IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, ALOK KUMAR PANDEY, JJ.
Sanjeev Kumar, S/o. Late Badri Narayan Prasad - Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar - Respondent
Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 726 of 2018
Decided On : 07-11-2023
CRIMINAL LAW - RAPE AND CHILD SEXUAL OFFENCES - IPC SECTION 376, POCSO ACT SECTION 6 - The court discussed the provisions of Section 376 of the IPC, which pertains to the punishment for rape, and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, which deals with aggravated sexual assault against children. The court highlighted that under Section 42 of the POCSO Act, no separate sentence was warranted under the IPC when a conviction under the POCSO Act was made. The court emphasized the importance of the victim's testimony and the context of the case, ultimately affirming the trial court's decision based on the evidence presented.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, the father of the victim, was convicted for raping his daughter under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The victim reported the incident after escaping from the appellant's attempts to assault her. The case was supported by testimonies from family members and the victim herself, despite the defense arguing that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the victim's testimony was credible and consistent, despite the lack of conclusive medical evidence. The court noted that the victim's actions in reporting the assault were significant and that the absence of forensic evidence did not undermine her account. The court concluded that the trial court's conviction was justified based on the evidence presented.
Issues: Whether the prosecution proved the charges of rape and aggravated sexual assault against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt, and whether the trial court's conviction was warranted given the evidence and testimonies presented.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the victim's testimony, corroborated by the circumstances and the context of the case, was sufficient to uphold the conviction. The court emphasized that the lack of forensic evidence does not negate the victim's account, especially in cases of sexual assault where such evidence may not always be available.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, affirming the trial court's conviction and sentence of life imprisonment for the appellant under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
JUDGMENT :
Ashutosh Kumar, J.
1. We have heard Mr. Ajit Ranjan Kumar, the learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, the learned APP for the State.
2. The appellant stands convicted under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for life, to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further suffer S.I. for one year for the offence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 vide judgement and order dated 10.04.2018 and 13.04.2018 respectively passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1st, Patna-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Patna, passed in Special Case No. 33 of 2015 arising out of Khaje Kalan P.S. Case No.143 of 2013. Eighty percent of fine amount has been directed to be deposited in the bank account of the victim, which shall be utilized by her for her future education. In view of the provisions contained in Section 42 of the POCSO Act, 2012, no separate sentence has been awarded under Section 376 of the IPC.
3. The appellant is the father of the victim (P.W. 4) who has alleged that the appellant had been molesting her and had also committed rape with her on 04.07.2013 in the early hours. She could any how save herself and got out of his stranglehold and came to the police station to report about the occurrence. She had been accompanied by her grandmother (P.W. 1), her aunt (P.W. 3) and her cousin (P.W. 5) who are witnesses to the FIR. The younger brother of the victim (P.W. 2) also claims to have seen the appellant making attempts to disrobe and rape the victim. He was aware that the appellant had behaved like that with his sister a number of times in the past. Because of such beastly act of the appellant, the mother of the victim had committed suicide about few months ago.
4. On the basis of the written report by the victim, a case was registered against the appellant vide Khaje Kalan P.S. Case No. 143 of 2013, dated 04.07.2013 under Section 376 of the IPC. Later, Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 was also added.
5. The Trial Court, after having examined seven witnesses on behalf of the prosecution including the victim, the I.O. and the Doctor and five persons on behalf of the defence, convicted and sentenced the appellant as aforesaid.
6. Mr. Ajit Ranjan Kumar, the learned Advocate for the appellant has urged that though the look of the case is bad but the prosecution has not been able to prove the case beyond all reasonable doubts. He has submitted that there have been glaring lapses on the part of the prosecuting agency which goes to the root of the matter and thereby makes the evidence fall short of a full proof case against the appellant. Though the victim was examined medically but there was no conclusive opinion regarding rape. The appellant but was never subjected to any medical examination. No evidence was brought on record apart from the deposition of the family members of the victim and victim herself about the earlier action of the appellant of molesting his own daughter.
7. According to the prosecution case, it has been argued that the mother of the victim had committed suicide few months ago. She chose to end her life only because she could not control her husband in raping his daughter. It has been contended that if the mother of the victim had committed suicide and if no case by her family members was filed, for sure a U.D. case would have been lodged. It further appears, it has been contended, that the mother of the victim remained alive for few days before she succumbed to the burn injuries. Was she in a position to talk during that period is again a factor which should have been taken into account by the investigating agency. If she had committed suicide out of exasperation in not preventing the appellant from raping her daughter, she would have, for sure, stated that when she was expecting death. No person of the neighbourhood has come to support the prosecution case; on the co
The court established that in cases of sexual assault, the victim's testimony can be sufficient for conviction, even in the absence of corroborative medical evidence, provided it is credible and cons....
The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, leading to the appellant's acquittal due to significant doubts regarding witness credibility and procedural violations.
In sexual offence cases, the prosecution must prove allegations beyond reasonable doubt, and the victim's testimony must be credible; inconsistencies can lead to acquittal.
The absence of medical evidence does not negate the credibility of a victim's testimony in sexual assault cases, and minor inconsistencies do not render it untrustworthy.
The judgment underscores the critical importance of credible evidence and thorough investigation in sexual offense cases, reaffirming that the prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt f....
The prosecution must provide credible evidence beyond reasonable doubt in sexual assault cases; inconsistencies in witness testimony and absence of corroborative evidence can lead to acquittal.
The court upheld the conviction for rape under IPC and POCSO Act, emphasizing the credibility of the victim's testimony and the need for sensitivity in child sexual assault cases.
The burden of proof under Sec. 29 of the POCSO Act, consistency of evidence, and the applicability of relevant sections of the POCSO Act and IPC in cases of sexual offenses against minors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.