CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
Raju Kumar Yadav S/o Dhaneshwar Yadav @ Dhanesar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.
1. These appeals have been preferred by the appellants under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, putting to challenge the impugned judgment of conviction dated 17.04.2018 and the order of sentence dated 24.04.2018, passed by learned 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (POCSO Act), Gaya, arising out of Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 54 of 2014, POCSO Case No. 12 of 2015, whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:
| Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 702 of 2018 | ||||
| Appellant | Penal Provision | Sentence | ||
| Imprisonment | Fine (Rs.) | In default of fine | ||
| Raju Kumar Yadav | Under Section 302/34 of the IPC | R.I. for life | 25,000/- | R.I. for two years |
| Under Section 201/34 | R.I. for seven years | 10,000/- | R.I. for one year
| |
| Under Section 6 of the POCSO Act | R.I. for life | 25,000/- | R.I. for two years | |
| Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 719 of 2018 | ||||
| Dharmendra Kumar | Under Section 302/34 of the IPC | R.I. for life | 25,000/- | R.I. for two years |
| Under Section 201/34 | R.I. for seven years | 10,000/- | R.I. for one year | |
| Under Section 6 of the POCSO Act | R.I. for life | 25,000/- | R.I. f | |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.