JUDGMENT :

Harish Kumar, J.

Heard the parties.

2. The challenge in the present Letters Patent Appeal is made to an order/judgment of this Court dated 22.06.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWJC No. 5544 of 2021 whereby and whereunder the writ petition has been allowed after setting aside the order of the District Magistrate (Appellate Authority) upholding the order of the District Programme Officer dated 05.06.2018 under Memo No. 391.

3. The grounds put forth by the learned Advocate for the appellant, challenging the order/judgment of the learned Single Judge, inter alia, is that the writ petitioner-respondent no. 9 herein was not even present in the Aam Sabha proceedings dated 08.02.2017 and 05.02.2017 conducted for the selection of Anganbadi Sevika. It is further contended that respondent no. 9 only submitted supplementary marksheet of the year 2014 in which she has obtained only 35 marks in mathematics out of 100 marks, despite the fact her name has been included in the merit list prepared for the appointment of Anganbadi Sevika. The application submitted by the respondent no. 9 for the post of Anganbadi Sevika clearly demonstrates her passing year of Matriculation Examina