IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
K. Vinod Chandran, CJ., Harish Kumar, J.
Santosh Kumar Son of Shiv Bahal Singh - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj and ors. – Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5850 of 2024
Decided On : 05-04-2024
JUDICIAL REVIEW - PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION - The court dismissed a writ petition seeking to direct the State Government to adhere to guidelines for constructing a Panchayat Sarkar Bhavan, emphasizing that the selection of the site falls under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Gram Panchayat and the State Government, which must ensure compliance with the guidelines.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking a direction for the construction of a Panchayat Sarkar Bhavan in Revenue Village Khaira, arguing that the authorities were planning to build it in an unsuitable location contrary to the guidelines issued by the Government of Bihar.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the proposed site had already been selected with the necessary approvals and that the petitioner did not specifically plead a breach of the guidelines. The court noted that similar issues had been raised previously and reaffirmed that the site selection is within the jurisdiction of the Gram Panchayat and the State Government.
Issues: Whether the court should intervene in the site selection for the Panchayat Sarkar Bhavan and direct adherence to the guidelines issued by the Government of Bihar.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the situs of the Panchayat Sarkar Bhavan is within the domain of the Gram Panchayat, and the State Government has exclusive control over the matter, making judicial intervention unnecessary.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as no order was deemed necessary at this stage.
JUDGMENT :
Harish Kumar, J.
Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner while invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has filed the writ petition by way of Public Interest Litigation, seeking a direction upon the State Government and its authorities to consider for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhavan at Revenue Village Khaira under Prakhand and Anchal-Ben, District Nalanda, strictly under the guidelines issued by the Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that under the Gram Panchyati Raj Khaira, there are altogether thirteen villages and the village Khaira is a Revenue village, bigger than any other village under the Gram Panchayat. Despite availability of several suitable lands under the Revenue village Khaira, the respondent authorities propose to construct Panchayat Sarkar Bhavan of Gram Panchayat Khaira in village Dharni Bigha, in the premises of school of Dharni Bigha.
4. Submission has been made that the respondent authorities started construction contrary to the guidelines issued by the Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna which prescribes the modes of selection of lands for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhavan. It is also submitted that the petitioner alongwith others have raised their voice before all the State officials, however, having found no response, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.
5. From the averments made in the writ petition and the annexure appended thereto, prima facie it appears that the proposed land has already been selected on being given no objection certificate by the Circle Officer, Ben, District -Nalanda and after getting administrative approval, a tender has also been invited from the bidders for construction of different Panchayat Sarkar Bhavan, the copy of which is produced as Annexure 2 to the writ petition. The petitioner also does not plead the specific breach of the guidelines.
6. Repeatedly similar issue in relation to construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhavan on a suitable or alternative places are being raised before this Court through different Public Interest Litigation. This Court has categorically observed that the situs of Panchayat Sarkar Bhavan is within the domain of the Gram Panchayat and the State Government has the exclusive control over it which is the competent authority to look into the matter that the terms of the guidelines issued in this regard are followed.
7. In such circumstances, any order passed by this Court shall be uncalled for thus, no order is required to be passed at this stage.
8. The present writ petition stands dismissed.
The selection of the site for the construction of a Panchayat Sarkar Bhavan is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Gram Panchayat and the State Government, and the court will not intervene in suc....
Policy decisions regarding government building construction are not subject to scrutiny under Public Interest Litigation.
The decision on construction sites by governmental authorities is a policy matter, not open to judicial review unless mala fides are present.
The court will not interfere with the decision of the State authorities regarding the construction of public buildings unless there is evidence of malafides or violation of statutory rules.
The court emphasized that new issues cannot be raised in a writ petition that were not raised before the lower courts, and the court cannot adjudicate the appropriate location for the construction of....
Judicial intervention in administrative decisions regarding public utility construction is restricted to instances of legal violations or malafides.
Judicial review of administrative decisions related to the construction of public utility buildings is limited to cases of flagrant violation of law/rules or malafides.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.