SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 341

ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Anand Krishna – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s Siyaram Sahi, Ranjan Kumar Singh.
For the State : Mr. R. K. Priyadarshi-SC 32.
For the AICTE : Ms. Archana.

Anil Kumar Sinha, J. – The present writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion in Lecturer (Selection Grade) with effect from 03.03.2009, with all consequential benefits. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing of the order, contained in Memo No. 1617, dated 20.07.2011, issued under the signature of Joint Secretary, Department of Science and Technology Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, by which the claim of the petitioner for promotion in Lecturer (Selection Grade) has been rejected on the ground that higher qualification of the petitioner is not related to the field of his basic subject, as such, the higher qualification of Ph.D. acquired by the petitioner is not valid as per the norms of the All India Council for Technical Education (in short, ‘AICTE’) for grant of Lecturer (Selection Grade) under the Career Advancement Scheme to the petitioner.

2. The facts involved in the present case, in narrow compass, is that the petitioner, having the qualification of B. Tech. in Textile and M.B.A., wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top