SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 840

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
INDER JIT DUA – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

W.P. (C) 2339/2025, W.P. (C) 2340/2025 & W.P. (C) 2347/2025

1. These writ petitions emanate from a judgment dated 19 February 2024 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [“the Tribunal” hereinafter] in three original applications. The Tribunal has treated OA 3058/2016, filed by Satish Bihari Mathur, the respondent in WP (C) 2340/2025, as the lead case. We also, therefore, would be referring to the facts apropos Satish Bihari Mathur.

2. The reference to the “respondent” would, therefore, be a reference to Satish Bihari Mathur.

3. The respondent was appointed as Drawing Instructor with the Directorate of Training and Technical Education [“DTTE” hereinafter]. Following the recommendations of a committee known as the Madan Committee, 87 posts of Junior Lecturer, Senior Drawing Instructor and Demonstrator among others, in the DTTE, were abolished and an equal number of posts of Lecturers and Officers were created. Of these, 63 posts were of Lecturer in the pay scale of Rs. 2200-4000. On 12 December 1988, the respondent was upgraded as Lecturer on ad hoc basis.

4. The respondent was regularised in the post of Lecturer with effect from 28 May 1990 by order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top