SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 351

RAJIV ROY
Bishundeo Prasad Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr.Ranvijay Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Lalit Kishore (Ag).

Rajiv Roy, J. – Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Mukul Prasad, representing the State and Dr. Anand Kumar for the National Highways Authority of India (henceforth for short ‘ the N.H.A.I.’). –

1. The petitioners crave indulgence through an appropriate writ or writs commanding and directing respondent authorities for Relief/ Reliefs as prayed:-

a. For that through an appropriate writ or writs commanding and directing to the respondent to restore the possession of the petitioner of the some portion of land bearing Khata No.-67, 49, Khesra No.-477, 474, Thana No.-165 Area near about 15 decimal which is illegally been acquired/encroach by the respondents without following the due process of law, during the construction of road by the respondents of NH-82, at Nakatpura, under which petitioner become aggrieved.

b. For that further direction may be given to provide the reasonable compensation and litigation costs, to the petitioners who is fully entitled in accordance of law as against the act of respondents who has not taken any step with regard to properties of petitioners acquired/ encroached by the respondents by way of illegality in malafide, arbitrary an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top