IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SUNITA AGARWAL, MANJIVE SHUKLA, JJ.
Rajesh Chandra @ Rakesh and Another – Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. and Others – Respondents
Writ (C) No. 34016 of 2022
Decided On : 02-03-2023
National Highway Act - Land Acquisition - Section 3A, 3D, 3G, 3H - The court required an explanation for the delay in the declaration of award and disbursement of compensation under the National Highway Act, 1956. The court found that the authorities had not taken action for over 3 years after issuing notices for land acquisition. The court highlighted the provisions of the Act related to acquisition, declaration of award, dispossession of tenure holders, and determination of compensation. It noted that no award had been made, and compensation had not been deposited, leading to the dispossession of landowners without due process.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners claimed that their land was acquired for the construction of a national highway, but compensation had not been provided despite approaching the authorities for a long time. The State-respondents admitted to acquiring the land but had not completed the award declaration process for 9 villages, including the petitioners'. The court required an explanation for the delay in award declaration and compensation disbursement.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the authorities had not taken action for over 3 years after issuing notices for land acquisition. It noted that no award had been made, and compensation had not been deposited, leading to the dispossession of landowners without due process.
Issues: Delay in award declaration and compensation disbursement under the National Highway Act, 1956.
Ratio Decidendi: The court highlighted the provisions of the Act related to acquisition, declaration of award, dispossession of tenure holders, and determination of compensation. It noted that no award had been made, and compensation had not been deposited, leading to the dispossession of landowners without due process.
Final Decision: The court called for an inquiry into the matter, required completion of award preparation for the 9 villages, and directed the deposit of determined compensation by the NHAI. It also mandated recovery of any financial loss from the guilty officials and disposed of the impleadment application.
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioners herein, claim to be residents of House No. 74 Bheekampur, Dayalpur, Tehsil and District Auraiya and stated to be owners of Arazi No. 558 area 0.041 hectares situated at Mauza/Pargana Bheekampur Tehsil and District Auraiya and claim that their names are recorded in the revenue records namely Khatauni for the fasli year 1428-1433. A perusal of the copy of the Khatauni appended as Annexure-1 to the writ petition, indicates that the names of the petitioners, herein, have been shown as the owners of Gata No. 528 area 0.041 hectare.
2. The contention in the writ petition is that the land in question was acquired for the construction of National Highway widening of 2 lane to 4 lane NH-II, in the year 2015-2016. The notice under Section 3G (4) of the National Highway Act, 1956, fixing 7.5.2018 was issued to the petitioners inviting their objections by the competent authority. It is further stated that in compliance of the said notice, petitioners approached the competent authority and submitted the revenue papers to put forth their claim for disbursement of compensation. It was then transpired that the compensation for acquisition of Arazi No. 558 area 0.041 hectare, plot in question has not been determined by the competent authority. The contention is that though the construction of Highway has been completed but compensation has not been provided to the petitioners despite the fact that they have been approaching the respondents for a long time.
3. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State-respondents, pursuant to the order dated 30.11.2022 passed by this Court whereby reasons were called for from the competent authority to explain for non declaration of award for more than six years, it is admitted that Gata No. 558, area 0.008 hectares had been acquired for widening of NH-II from 4 lane to 6 lane. The acquisition notifications were issued under Section 3A and 3D of the National Highways Act, 1956. Out of the land of total 37 villages acquired by the aforesaid notifications, the award for 28 villages had been declared and the proceeding for declaration of award for 9 villages has not been completed. Individual notices were issued to the tenure holders village-wise and the date of hearing fixed by the competent authority has been indicated in para-6 of the counter affidavit of the State. It is stated therein that the objections of the tenure holders have been received and kept on record.
4. However, the stand of the State-respondents is that under Section 3B of the National Highways Act pertaining to the power of survey, it is provided that after issuance of the notification under Section 3A, the survey would be conducted by the authorised officer appointed by the Central Government. The power of survey includes inquiry/ investigation/survey/valuation and inspection of the site in question. It is then contended that for declaration of the award of 9 villages, the competent authority completed the following actions for evaluation of the affected land of the remaining 9 villages:
(II) On 21.07.2020 pertaining to the point No. 7 of the meeting held with Project direction National Highway, Kanpur, the valuation report was directed to be made available. A copy of the letter dated 21.07.2020 is being enclosed herewith and marked as Annexure No. 2 to this affidavit.
(III) Vide memo no. 137 dated 19.06.2021, the meeting scheduled on 25.06.2021 was sent. A copy of the letter dated 19.06.2021 is being enclosed herewith and marked as Annexure No. 3 to this affidavit.
(IV) Vide memo no. 171 dated 12.07.2021, the letter was issued for disposal of pending matters. A copy of the letter dated 12.07.2021 is being enclosed herewith and marked as Annexure No. 4 to this affidavit.
(V) Thereafter vide memo no. 188 dated 20.07.2021 a letter was issu
The National Highway Act, 1956 provides for the acquisition of private properties for the construction of national highways, including the process of award declaration and compensation determination.....
The procedure under Sections 3G and 3E of the National Highways Act was duly followed in passing the awards.
The court established that compliance with procedural requirements of the National Highways Act is essential for valid land acquisition, particularly regarding timely compensation to affected parties....
The court affirmed that possession of land for public use requires legal authority and compensation, emphasizing that delay cannot bar just claims for compensation.
The State must follow legal procedures for land acquisition and cannot evade compensation obligations based on delay or laches.
Point of Law - Section 3-H (4) of the National Highways Act, 1956, if any dispute arises as to the apportionment of the amount or any part thereof or to any person to whom the same or any part thereo....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.