Dasharath Ram vs State of Bihar - 2023 Supreme(Pat) 1401

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Pat) 1401

P. B. BAJANTHRI, RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
Dasharath Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh.
For the Respondent: Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha (GA-7).

P. B. Bajanthri, J. – The appellant has assailed the order of the learned Single Judge dated 02.04.2019 passed in CWJC No. 5174 of 2019.

2. Appellant was appointed as Vikash Mitra under the guidelines issued by the State Government vide Annexure-A to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State.

3. The appellant while working as Vikash Mitra on certain complaints show-cause notice was stated to have been issued and explanation has been obtained. Thereafter, it is reliably learnt that inquiry was also held. While taking these material the concerned District Welfare Officer proceeded to terminate the services of the appellant with the consent/approval of the jurisdictional District Magistrate (ftyk inkfèkdkjh ).

4. If the appellant suffered an order before the learned Single Judge. Before the learned Single Judge appellant address the argument that procedures have not been followed while terminating the services and further it is contented that District Welfare Officer is not a competent authority to terminate the services of the appellant. On the other hand, it is only District Project Officer (ftyk ifj;kstuk inkfèkdkjh ). It is necessary to reproduce extract of the learned Singl