SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 423

CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Sidheshwar Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s Purushotam Sharma, Ravi Prakash.
For the Opp. Parties : Smt. Sangeeta Sharma, APP.

Chandra Shekhar Jha, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondent.

2. The present quashing petition has been preferred to quash the order dated 07.04.2015 passed in Complaint Case No. 27 of 2015, where learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rosera-Samastipur, took cognizance for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 342, 384 & 386 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act against the petitioners.

3. Despite proper service of notice opposite party No. 2, fails to join the present court proceedings.

4. From the crux of complaint petition it appears that complainant and other witnesses of the present complaint purchased more than 12 bigha land from Chandresekhar Prasad Singh, Nageshwar Prasad Singh, Jyotish Kumar Singh, Prakash Kumar Singh and Bikash Kumar Singh on 19.12.2014, where complainant purchased 10 katha of land. It is alleged that on 05.01.2015 around 10:00 AM all accused persons came with their illegal weapon on the alleged land purchased by complainant. It is further alleged that they all surrounded the complainant at the mention of land and demanded Rs. 50,000/- of levy and threatened that they will not allow

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top