Back
ARUN KUMAR JHA
Satyasheel Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Navin Kumar Singh – Respondent
Arun Kumar Jha, J. – The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 04.12.2018 passed by the learned Sub Judge-7, Begusarai in Execution Case No.1/2016 whereby and whereunder the petition dated 03.02.2018 filed on behalf of the judgment debtor has been rejected.
2. The respondents are decree-holders and they filed Title Suit No. 171 of 2007 against the grandfather, father and uncle of the petitioner in the court of learned Sub Judge, Begusarai. The suit was filed for declaration of title in respect of Schedule-A property and for recovery of possession from defendants 1st and 2nd set by demolishing the construction made by them on the suit land as well as for mesne profit and injunction. The defendants appeared and filed their written statement controverting the claim of the plaintiffs. Title Suit No. 171 of 2007 was finally heard and decided vide judgment and decree dated 08.09.2016 on contest in favour of the plaintiffs. The defendants 1st set, who are members of joint family of the petitioner, preferred appeal before the learned District Judge, Begusarai vide Title Appeal No. 14/2016 and the said title appeal is still pen
Non-executability of decree – If decree is not nullity, executing court is required to execute such decree unless it has been set aside by a competent court in an appropriate proceeding.
A decree remains executable even if some defendants are deceased, provided their heirs are on record and did not contest the suit.
Execution of joint decrees remains valid even with subsequent transfers of interest by decree-holders, and a judgment-debtor cannot escape execution by claiming ownership.
The executing court is bound by the decree's terms and cannot entertain objections that do not pertain to jurisdiction, even if the decree is allegedly erroneous.
One joint decree-holder may apply for execution for the benefit of all unless expressly stated otherwise; courts can assess intent beyond strict decree wording.
The executing court is bound to execute the decree as per its terms and cannot entertain frivolous objections that delay justice.
The executing Court cannot go behind the decree and must execute it according to its tenor, and cannot entertain objections to the decree's correctness in law or on facts, unless it is a nullity or p....
An ex parte decree that is cryptic and non-compliant with procedural requirements cannot be executed; necessary amendments to parties and relief sought must be pursued to validate execution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
